College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University Cuts LGBTQ Studies Minor Amid Controversy
Texas A&M University has announced the elimination of its minor in LGBTQ Studies, a decision sparking significant debate among faculty and state lawmakers. This change comes as part of a broader reduction of 52 programs deemed low-performing by the university’s Board of Regents.
The Decision
The Board of Regents voted unanimously last week to eliminate several minors and certificates, including LGBTQ Studies. The program, which had been initiated just a year prior, served only a handful of students—three in Spring 2024 and two for Fall 2024. Faculty members expressed their disappointment, arguing that the minor had only begun to establish itself and criticized the board for insufficient consultation with academic staff before making the decision.
Key Figures Involved
State Representative Brian Harrison, a Texas A&M alumnus, has been a vocal opponent of the LGBTQ program. He claims the initiative is an example of “taxpayer-funded leftist propaganda.” Following the university’s announcement, he stated, “I want to end all taxpayer-funded leftist propaganda in every single one of our public institutions of higher learning.” His comments highlight his intent to see similar programs across Texas state universities dismantled.
The Background
The controversy surrounding the LGBTQ Studies minor escalated earlier this year when Harrison publicly questioned the program’s existence, tweeting, “Texas A&M is offering a MINOR in this??” The faculty, including sociology professor Chaitanya Lakkimsetti, argued that the elimination of the minor constitutes an attack on academic freedom and critical thinking. He highlighted the program’s potential value, citing that it aimed to provide important educational perspectives on gender and sexuality.
Implications and Reactions
Despite faculty objections and concerns about academic freedom, the program’s fate was sealed. Onlookers argue this move may establish a precedent for further reductions in humanities and social sciences programs across the state. Harrison has expressed little sympathy for those opposed to the decision, emphasizing that public universities should align with the values of Texas taxpayers.
A Broader Trend?
State Representative Harrison views this decision as part of a larger effort to reshape higher education in Texas. He suggested that if necessary, substantial budget cuts could be on the horizon to ensure that taxpayer money is not used for what he describes as “liberal indoctrination.” As the university’s chancellor previously assured Harrison that the program would be cut, many fear further cuts could come in the near future.
Conclusion
The elimination of the LGBTQ Studies minor at Texas A&M University reflects ongoing tensions surrounding academic programs that focus on social and cultural issues. With legislative backing fueling these changes, it remains to be seen how other universities will respond and whether the trend will continue beyond Texas A&M. Faculty members and supporters of the program continue to voice their concerns about the implications this decision may have on academic freedom and the diverse educational opportunities available to students.
